Quadro P3200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated245
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.18
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV28 A2GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date16 February 2003 (21 year ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed275 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1543 MHz
Number of transistors36 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200172.8
Floating-point processing powerno data5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-B (3.0)
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.4 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE 6
Quadro P3200 8792
+146433%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 February 2003 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm

Quadro P3200 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE and Quadro P3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is a desktop card while Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 30 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 294 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.