Radeon HD 8210E vs GeForce4 MX 460

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 MX 460 with Radeon HD 8210E, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 MX 460
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

HD 8210E outperforms GeForce4 MX 460 by a whopping 4900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15121233
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.81
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (22 years ago)23 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed300 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors29 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data9 Watt
Texture fill rate1.2002.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed225 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 MX 460 0.01
HD 8210E 0.50
+4900%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 MX 460 4
HD 8210E 193
+4725%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 0.50
Recency 6 February 2002 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

HD 8210E has a 4900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 8210E is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 460 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 460
GeForce4 MX 460
AMD Radeon HD 8210E
Radeon HD 8210E

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 26 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.