GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs GeForce4 440 Go

Place in the ranking	1518	5
Place by popularity	not in top-100	68
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	38.25
Power efficiency	no data	19.37
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	NV17 A5	AD103
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	6 February 2002 (22 years ago)	8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	10240
Core clock speed	220 MHz	2295 MHz
Boost clock speed	220 MHz	2550 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.88	816.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	52.22 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	112
TMUs	4	320
Tensor Cores	no data	320
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 4x	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	220 MHz	1438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	7.04 GB/s	736.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.8
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 440 Go 0.01

RTX 4080 SUPER 88.90
+888900%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 440 Go 3

RTX 4080 SUPER 34293
+1143000%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	264
1440p	-0−1	181
4K	-0−1	120

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.78
1440p	no data	5.52
4K	no data	8.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3
−887400%

17750−17800

+887400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −7733%	235 +7733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −887400%	17750−17800 +887400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3125%	120−130 +3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3800%	300−350 +3800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −9825%	350−400 +9825%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −450%	150−160 +450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −11300%	342 +11300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −887400%	17750−17800 +887400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3125%	120−130 +3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −3800%	300−350 +3800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −14100%	568 +14100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −2156%	200−210 +2156%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −450%	150−160 +450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −5167%	158 +5167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −5900%	120−130 +5900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −887400%	17750−17800 +887400%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3125%	120−130 +3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −5213%	425 +5213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −13075%	527 +13075%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −2822%	263 +2822%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −418%	145 +418%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −2050%	120−130 +2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −17150%	345 +17150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−6350%

120−130
+6350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −9500%	96 +9500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	99

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−5450%

110−120
+5450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	281 +0%	281 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	237 +0%	237 +0%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 +0%	260−270 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	209 +0%	209 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	322 +0%	322 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+0%

120−130

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	135 +0%	135 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	165 +0%	165 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	171 +0%	171 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	397 +0%	397 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	221 +0%	221 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Hitman 3	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85 +0%	85 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	204 +0%	204 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	305 +0%	305 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	201 +0%	201 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	81 +0%	81 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 SUPER is 17150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4080 SUPER is ahead in 25 tests (38%)
there's a draw in 40 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	88.90
Recency	6 February 2002	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	16 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	5 nm

RTX 4080 SUPER has a 888900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 year, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 440 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 440 Go is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.