T1000 vs GeForce4 4200 Go

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 4200 Go with T1000, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 4200 Go
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

T1000 outperforms GeForce4 4200 Go by a whopping 198500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1522283
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.39
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV28MTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 November 2002 (22 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6896
Core clock speed2 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed200 MHz1395 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data78.12
Floating-point processing powerno data2.5 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 4200 Go 0.01
T1000 19.86
+198500%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 4200 Go 3
T1000 7633
+254333%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−158

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−650%
45
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−467%
34
+467%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1640%
87
+1640%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1433%
45−50
+1433%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−367%
28
+367%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−2500%
130
+2500%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1280%
69
+1280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−3250%
130−140
+3250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1433%
45−50
+1433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1450%
60−65
+1450%
World of Tanks 8−9
−2788%
230−240
+2788%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−300%
24
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−1240%
65−70
+1240%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1100%
60
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−3250%
130−140
+3250%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−198233%
5950−6000
+198233%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1225%
50−55
+1225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Valorant 4−5
−1175%
50−55
+1175%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−197400%
3950−4000
+197400%
Dota 2 14−16
−198233%
29750−29800
+198233%
Valorant 0−1 24−27

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 62
+0%
62
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 42
+0%
42
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
World of Tanks 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the T1000 is 3250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 is ahead in 21 test (39%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (61%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 19.86
Recency 15 November 2002 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

T1000 has a 198500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

The T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 4200 Go is a notebook card while T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go
GeForce4 4200 Go
NVIDIA T1000
T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 4200 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 64 votes

Rate T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.