ATI FirePro V9800 vs GeForce2 MX 400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNV11 B2Cypress
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2001 (23 years ago)9 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1600
Core clock speed200 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors20 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.868.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s147.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.24.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 9 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 40 nm

ATI V9800 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 400 and FirePro V9800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 400 is a desktop card while FirePro V9800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
GeForce2 MX 400
ATI FirePro V9800
FirePro V9800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 116 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro V9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.