RTX A4000 Mobile vs GeForce2 MX 200 LP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV11 B3GA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 March 2001 (23 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed175 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors20 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data140 Watt (80 - 125 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate0.7290.9
Floating-point performanceno data18.62 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 8 nm

RTX A4000 Mobile has an age advantage of 20 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 200 LP and RTX A4000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 200 LP is a desktop card while RTX A4000 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200 LP
GeForce2 MX 200 LP
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 20 votes

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.