Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs GeForce2 Go 100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV11 B2GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2001 (23 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed125 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistors20 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.5489.6
Floating-point processing powerno data15.67 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs4320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount16 MB32 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz876 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s897.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2001 27 March 2018
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce2 Go 100 has 12400% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Go 100 and Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 Go 100 is a notebook card while Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
GeForce2 Go 100
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB
Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.