GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a vs GeForce2 Go 100

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNV11 B2C78
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 February 2001 (23 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed125 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors20 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate0.54.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.23.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2001 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 180 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 40 Watt

GeForce2 Go 100 has 1900% lower power consumption.

8100 + nForce 720a, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Go 100 and GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 Go 100 is a notebook card while GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 100
GeForce2 Go 100
NVIDIA GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 17 votes

Rate GeForce 8100 nForce 720a on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.