Radeon 625 OEM vs GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameAD103Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9728384
Core clock speed930 MHz1024 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHzno data
Number of transistors45,900 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate442.324.58
Floating-point processing power28.31 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs1128
TMUs30424
Tensor Cores304no data
Ray Tracing Cores76no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.76.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2.170
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 4090 Max-Q has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

625 OEM, on the other hand, has 128.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q and Radeon 625 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon 625 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
AMD Radeon 625 OEM
Radeon 625 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 145 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 625 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.