Arc A380 vs GeForce RTX 4080 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated331
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.67
Power efficiencyno data14.86
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAD102DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2023 (1 year ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores140801024
Core clock speed2340 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed2610 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors76,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate1,148131.2
Floating-point processing power73.5 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs14432
TMUs44064
Tensor Cores440128
Ray Tracing Cores1108

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length336 mm222 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1325 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth678.4 GB/s186.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 4080 Ti has a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4080 Ti and Arc A380. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 663 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 810 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.