Tesla C1080 vs GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameAD104GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)9 April 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7424240
Core clock speed795 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors35,800 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate313.248.80
Floating-point processing power20.04 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs8032
TMUs23280
Tensor Cores232no data
Ray Tracing Cores58no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.74.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.91.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 188 Watt

RTX 4080 Max-Q has an age advantage of 13 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q and Tesla C1080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q is a notebook card while Tesla C1080 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q
NVIDIA Tesla C1080
Tesla C1080

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.