Radeon RX 8800 XT vs GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.32no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 4.0
GPU code nameAD106Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46084096
Core clock speed1395 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2430 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate244.1622.1
Floating-point processing power15.62 TFLOPS19.91 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs144256
Tensor Cores144no data
Ray Tracing Cores3664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 220 Watt

RTX 4070 Mobile has 91.3% lower power consumption.

RX 8800 XT, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and Radeon RX 8800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a notebook card while Radeon RX 8800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
Radeon RX 8800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1765 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 84 votes

Rate Radeon RX 8800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.