Jetson TX2 vs GeForce RTX 4060

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49not rated
Place by popularity2not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.00no data
Power efficiency31.05no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameAD107GP10B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3072256
Core clock speed1830 MHz1300 MHz
Boost clock speed2460 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate236.220.80
Floating-point processing power15.11 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4816
TMUs9616
Tensor Cores96no data
Ray Tracing Cores24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x4
Length240 mm87 mm
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2125 MHz3.7 GB/s
Memory bandwidth272.0 GB/s59.71 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.86.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.96.2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 4060 has a 220% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson TX2, on the other hand, has 666.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4060 and Jetson TX2. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
NVIDIA Jetson TX2
Jetson TX2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 16906 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 7 votes

Rate Jetson TX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.