ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	33	not rated
Place by popularity	14	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	83.13	no data
Power efficiency	25.67	no data
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code name	AD106	RV515
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	no data
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	635 MHz
Boost clock speed	2535 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	22,900 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	27 Watt
Texture fill rate	344.8	2.540
Floating-point processing power	22.06 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	48	4
TMUs	136	4
Tensor Cores	136	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	34	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	240 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	800 MBps
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	6.7	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	5 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	160 Watt	27 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---