Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking34not rated
Place by popularity14not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation83.14no data
Power efficiency25.42no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Xe-LPG (2023)
GPU code nameAD106Meteor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 May 2023 (1 year ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4352512
Core clock speed2310 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed2535 MHz1750 MHz
Number of transistors22,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate344.856.00
Floating-point processing power22.06 TFLOPS1.792 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs13632
Tensor Cores136no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8Ring Bus
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 May 2023 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 65 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 146.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop card while Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 8629 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 20 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.