Radeon R7 350 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB

Place in the ranking	34	600
Place by popularity	92	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	63.77	no data
Power efficiency	24.87	7.02
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	AD106	Cape Verde
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2023 (1 year ago)	6 July 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	512
Core clock speed	2310 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	2535 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	22,900 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	55 Watt
Texture fill rate	344.8	25.60
Floating-point processing power	22.06 TFLOPS	0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	136	32
Tensor Cores	136	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	34	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	240 mm	168 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.7	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131
CUDA	8.9	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	174 +988%	16−18 −988%
1440p	94 +1075%	8−9 −1075%
4K	57 +1040%	5−6 −1040%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.87	no data
1440p	5.31	no data
4K	8.75	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +1130%	10−11 −1130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +1056%	9−10 −1056%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +1081%	16−18 −1081%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +1010%	10−11 −1010%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +1010%	10−11 −1010%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +1092%	12−14 −1092%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +976%	21−24 −976%
Hitman 3	120−130 +1110%	10−11 −1110%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +967%	21−24 −967%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +1000%	14−16 −1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +1060%	10−11 −1060%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	230−240 +1038%	21−24 −1038%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +1133%	12−14 −1133%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +1130%	10−11 −1130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +1056%	9−10 −1056%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +1081%	16−18 −1081%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +1010%	10−11 −1010%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +1010%	10−11 −1010%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +1092%	12−14 −1092%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +976%	21−24 −976%
Hitman 3	120−130 +1110%	10−11 −1110%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +967%	21−24 −967%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +1000%	14−16 −1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +1060%	10−11 −1060%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	272 +1033%	24−27 −1033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +1140%	10−11 −1140%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +1133%	12−14 −1133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +1130%	10−11 −1130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−110 +1056%	9−10 −1056%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +1010%	10−11 −1010%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +1010%	10−11 −1010%
Forza Horizon 4	220−230 +976%	21−24 −976%
Hitman 3	120−130 +1110%	10−11 −1110%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230 +995%	21−24 −995%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	235 +1019%	21−24 −1019%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	132 +1000%	12−14 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +1133%	12−14 −1133%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120
+1060%

10−11

−1060%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	120−130 +975%	12−14 −975%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 +1063%	8−9 −1063%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 +1033%	6−7 −1033%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +1100%	6−7 −1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +1067%	6−7 −1067%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +1050%	6−7 −1050%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +1029%	24−27 −1029%
Hitman 3	80−85 +1100%	7−8 −1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	173 +981%	16−18 −981%
Metro Exodus	119 +1090%	10−11 −1090%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	153 +993%	14−16 −993%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	96 +967%	9−10 −967%
Watch Dogs: Legion	230−240 +1000%	21−24 −1000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−110

+1022%

9−10
−1022%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +1017%	6−7 −1017%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +1020%	5−6 −1020%
Hitman 3	50−55 +1150%	4−5 −1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +1122%	18−20 −1122%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +988%	8−9 −988%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 +1029%	7−8 −1029%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +1050%	4−5 −1050%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 +1000%	4−5 −1000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +1300%	3−4 −1300%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +1233%	3−4 −1233%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +1050%	8−9 −1050%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80 +1043%	7−8 −1043%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +1067%	3−4 −1067%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
+1080%

5−6

−1080%

This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and R7 350 compete in popular games:

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 988% faster in 1080p
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1075% faster in 1440p
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1040% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	59.28	5.58
Recency	18 May 2023	6 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	165 Watt	55 Watt

RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 962.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

R7 350, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 350 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.