Jetson Nano vs GeForce RTX 4050

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking124not rated
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Power efficiency25.71no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameAD107GM20B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2023 (1 year ago)March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560128
Core clock speed2505 MHz640 MHz
Boost clock speed2640 MHz921 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate211.214.74
Floating-point processing power13.52 TFLOPS0.2358 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8016
Tensor Cores120no data
Ray Tracing Cores18no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x4
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth216.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1
CUDA8.95.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 10 Watt

RTX 4050 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

Jetson Nano, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4050 and Jetson Nano. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop card while Jetson Nano is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050
NVIDIA Jetson Nano
Jetson Nano

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2065 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Jetson Nano on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.