Radeon PRO W7500 vs GeForce RTX 3090

Place in performance ranking	19	128
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	16.79	78.91
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Ampere GA102	Navi 33
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	24 September 2020 (3 years ago)	3 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,499	$429
Current price	$1198 (0.8x MSRP)	$409 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7500 has 370% better value for money than RTX 3090.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10496	1792
Core clock speed	1400 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1700 MHz	1700 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	556.0	190.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	313 mm	216 mm
Width	3-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	19500 MHz	10.8 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	936.2 GB/s	172.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3090 69.36
+95.2%

PRO W7500 35.53

GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Radeon PRO W7500 by 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3090 26786
+95.2%

PRO W7500 13722

GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Radeon PRO W7500 by 95% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	195 +105%	95−100 −105%
1440p	133 +105%	65−70 −105%
4K	89 +97.8%	45−50 −97.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

400−450
+93.2%

207

−93.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	300−310 +88.7%	159 −88.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	220−230 +94.7%	113 −94.7%
Battlefield 5	400−450 +80.2%	220−230 −80.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	230−240 +93.3%	110−120 −93.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	300−310 +70.5%	176 −70.5%
Far Cry 5	220−230 +88%	110−120 −88%
Far Cry New Dawn	300−310 +77.5%	160−170 −77.5%
Forza Horizon 4	450−500 +77.2%	254 −77.2%
Hitman 3	220−230 +88%	117 −88%
Horizon Zero Dawn	750−800 +86.1%	403 −86.1%
Metro Exodus	280−290 +94.4%	144 −94.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	250−260 +92.3%	130 −92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	950−1000 +88.1%	505 −88.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	250−260 +90.8%	131 −90.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	270−280 +88.8%	143 −88.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	190−200 +88.1%	101 −88.1%
Battlefield 5	400−450 +80.2%	220−230 −80.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	230−240 +93.3%	110−120 −93.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	290−300 +92.1%	151 −92.1%
Far Cry 5	220−230 +88%	110−120 −88%
Far Cry New Dawn	300−310 +77.5%	160−170 −77.5%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +84.3%	210−220 −84.3%
Hitman 3	240−250 +95.1%	123 −95.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	550−600 +87.7%	290−300 −87.7%
Metro Exodus	290−300 +89.5%	153 −89.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	250−260 +92.3%	130 −92.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	750−800 +86.6%	402 −86.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	700−750 +89.7%	369 −89.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	350−400 +75.9%	199 −75.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	210−220 +94.4%	108 −94.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	170−180 +88.9%	90 −88.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	230−240 +93.3%	110−120 −93.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	260−270 +94%	134 −94%
Far Cry 5	220−230 +88%	110−120 −88%
Forza Horizon 4	400−450 +84.3%	217 −84.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	550−600 +86.4%	295 −86.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	650−700 +85.2%	351 −85.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	350−400 +93.4%	181 −93.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	200−210 +86.9%	107 −86.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

250−260
+93.8%

129

−93.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	300−310 +81.8%	160−170 −81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	280−290 +94.4%	144 −94.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	180−190 +93.5%	93 −93.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	150−160 +92.3%	78 −92.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	200−210 +88.7%	106 −88.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	180−190 +93.5%	93 −93.5%
Far Cry 5	300−310 +75.4%	171 −75.4%
Forza Horizon 4	350−400 +77.7%	197 −77.7%
Hitman 3	220−230 +91.3%	115 −91.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	450−500 +93.1%	233 −93.1%
Metro Exodus	270−280 +94.2%	139 −94.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	500−550 +88%	266 −88%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	290−300 +90.8%	152 −90.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 +88.9%	90 −88.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

240−250
+89%

127

−89%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +83.9%	85−90 −83.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 +88.4%	65−70 −88.4%
Hitman 3	160−170 +92.8%	83 −92.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 +88.7%	100−110 −88.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 +85.6%	97 −85.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	290−300 +89.5%	153 −89.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130−140 +85.7%	70 −85.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +78.6%	56 −78.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	95−100 +86.3%	50−55 −86.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +84.8%	46 −84.8%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +90%	50−55 −90%
Forza Horizon 4	290−300 +89.5%	153 −89.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +94.4%	144 −94.4%
Metro Exodus	210−220 +94.4%	108 −94.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +83.3%	60 −83.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

210−220
+89.2%

111

−89.2%

This is how RTX 3090 and PRO W7500 compete in popular games:

RTX 3090 is 105% faster in 1080p
RTX 3090 is 105% faster in 1440p
RTX 3090 is 98% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	69.36	35.53
Recency	24 September 2020	3 August 2023
Cost	$1499	$429
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	70 Watt