Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs GeForce RTX 3090

Place in the ranking	24	416
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.92	no data
Power efficiency	13.58	19.73
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	no data
GPU code name	GA102	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	1 September 2020 (4 years ago)	no data
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	10496	1536
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1695 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	556.0	no data
Floating-point processing power	35.58 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	112	no data
TMUs	328	no data
Tensor Cores	328	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	82	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	no data
Length	336 mm	no data
Width	3-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	no data
Memory bus width	384 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1219 MHz	8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth	936.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2	-
CUDA	8.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3090 69.35
+503%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.51

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3090 61518
+771%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3090 124350
+417%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3090 47241
+577%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	198 +435%	37 −435%
1440p	129 +514%	21−24 −514%
4K	86 +514%	14−16 −514%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	7.57	no data
1440p	11.62	no data
4K	17.43	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

207

+590%

30−33
−590%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	159 +563%	24−27 −563%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	114 +533%	18−20 −533%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +534%	35−40 −534%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +561%	18−20 −561%
Cyberpunk 2077	176 +552%	27−30 −552%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +550%	18−20 −550%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +526%	27−30 −526%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +580%	35−40 −580%
Hitman 3	117 +550%	18−20 −550%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 +533%	40−45 −533%
Metro Exodus	144 +586%	21−24 −586%
Red Dead Redemption 2	130 +519%	21−24 −519%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	290−300 +549%	45−50 −549%
Watch Dogs: Legion	200 +567%	30−33 −567%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	247 +518%	40−45 −518%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	105 +556%	16−18 −556%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +534%	35−40 −534%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +561%	18−20 −561%
Cyberpunk 2077	151 +529%	24−27 −529%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +550%	18−20 −550%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +526%	27−30 −526%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +580%	35−40 −580%
Hitman 3	117 +550%	18−20 −550%
Horizon Zero Dawn	250−260 +533%	40−45 −533%
Metro Exodus	144 +586%	21−24 −586%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +578%	18−20 −578%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	402 +518%	65−70 −518%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +521%	24−27 −521%
Watch Dogs: Legion	199 +563%	30−33 −563%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	108 +575%	16−18 −575%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	91 +550%	14−16 −550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +561%	18−20 −561%
Cyberpunk 2077	134 +538%	21−24 −538%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +550%	18−20 −550%
Forza Horizon 4	217 +520%	35−40 −520%
Hitman 3	116 +544%	18−20 −544%
Horizon Zero Dawn	295 +556%	45−50 −556%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	351 +538%	55−60 −538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	181 +503%	30−33 −503%
Watch Dogs: Legion	107 +569%	16−18 −569%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

129

+514%

21−24
−514%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +511%	27−30 −511%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +511%	18−20 −511%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	93 +564%	14−16 −564%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 +558%	12−14 −558%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +575%	12−14 −575%
Cyberpunk 2077	93 +564%	14−16 −564%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +575%	12−14 −575%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +578%	40−45 −578%
Hitman 3	115 +539%	18−20 −539%
Horizon Zero Dawn	233 +566%	35−40 −566%
Metro Exodus	139 +562%	21−24 −562%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	266 +565%	40−45 −565%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	152 +533%	24−27 −533%
Watch Dogs: Legion	203 +577%	30−33 −577%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

127

+505%

21−24
−505%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +521%	14−16 −521%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +590%	10−11 −590%
Hitman 3	83 +592%	12−14 −592%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +546%	35−40 −546%
Metro Exodus	141 +571%	21−24 −571%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	153 +538%	24−27 −538%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70 +600%	10−11 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	57 +533%	9−10 −533%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +538%	8−9 −538%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +557%	7−8 −557%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +525%	8−9 −525%
Forza Horizon 4	153 +538%	24−27 −538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	159 +563%	24−27 −563%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60 +567%	9−10 −567%