GeForce MX570 vs RTX 3090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3090 with GeForce MX570, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3090
2020
24 GB GDDR6X, 350 Watt
69.27
+366%

RTX 3090 outperforms MX570 by a whopping 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking23350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.88no data
Power efficiency13.7141.16
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA102GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores104962048
Core clock speed1395 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate556.073.92
Floating-point processing power35.58 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs11240
TMUs32864
Tensor Cores32864
Ray Tracing Cores8216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1219 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3090 69.27
+366%
GeForce MX570 14.86

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3090 26731
+366%
GeForce MX570 5735

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD203
+408%
40−45
−408%
1440p134
+396%
27−30
−396%
4K89
+394%
18−20
−394%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.38no data
1440p11.19no data
4K16.84no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 207
+800%
21−24
−800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 159
+368%
30−35
−368%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 114
+375%
24−27
−375%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+363%
45−50
−363%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+297%
30−33
−297%
Cyberpunk 2077 176
+665%
21−24
−665%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+234%
35−40
−234%
Far Cry New Dawn 160−170
+312%
40−45
−312%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+148%
95−100
−148%
Hitman 3 117
+318%
27−30
−318%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+233%
75−80
−233%
Metro Exodus 144
+188%
50−55
−188%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130
+217%
40−45
−217%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 290−300
+508%
45−50
−508%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200
+156%
75−80
−156%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 247
+626%
30−35
−626%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 105
+338%
24−27
−338%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+363%
45−50
−363%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+297%
30−33
−297%
Cyberpunk 2077 151
+557%
21−24
−557%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+234%
35−40
−234%
Far Cry New Dawn 160−170
+312%
40−45
−312%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+148%
95−100
−148%
Hitman 3 117
+318%
27−30
−318%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+233%
75−80
−233%
Metro Exodus 144
+188%
50−55
−188%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+198%
40−45
−198%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 402
+738%
45−50
−738%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+326%
35−40
−326%
Watch Dogs: Legion 199
+155%
75−80
−155%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 108
+218%
30−35
−218%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
+279%
24−27
−279%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+297%
30−33
−297%
Cyberpunk 2077 134
+483%
21−24
−483%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+234%
35−40
−234%
Forza Horizon 4 217
+126%
95−100
−126%
Hitman 3 116
+314%
27−30
−314%
Horizon Zero Dawn 295
+288%
75−80
−288%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 351
+631%
45−50
−631%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 181
+417%
35−40
−417%
Watch Dogs: Legion 107
+37.2%
75−80
−37.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 129
+215%
40−45
−215%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+469%
27−30
−469%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+378%
21−24
−378%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 93
+520%
14−16
−520%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+558%
12−14
−558%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+406%
16−18
−406%
Cyberpunk 2077 93
+1063%
8−9
−1063%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+376%
16−18
−376%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+252%
75−80
−252%
Hitman 3 115
+539%
18−20
−539%
Horizon Zero Dawn 233
+677%
30−33
−677%
Metro Exodus 139
+435%
24−27
−435%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 266
+885%
27−30
−885%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+850%
16−18
−850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 203
+123%
90−95
−123%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+429%
24−27
−429%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+521%
14−16
−521%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+527%
10−12
−527%
Hitman 3 83
+655%
10−12
−655%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+205%
70−75
−205%
Metro Exodus 141
+907%
14−16
−907%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 153
+993%
14−16
−993%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70
+678%
9−10
−678%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 57
+714%
7−8
−714%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+629%
7−8
−629%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+665%
20−22
−665%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 159
+1036%
14−16
−1036%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
+900%
6−7
−900%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 111
+754%
12−14
−754%

This is how RTX 3090 and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3090 is 408% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3090 is 396% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3090 is 394% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3090 is 2200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3090 surpassed GeForce MX570 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 69.27 14.86
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 25 Watt

RTX 3090 has a 366.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has 1300% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop card while GeForce MX570 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 78943 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 92 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.