FirePro W4000 vs GeForce RTX 3090

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.90no data
Power efficiency13.80no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGA102Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)7 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10496768
Core clock speed1395 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate556.039.60
Floating-point processing power35.58 TFLOPS1.267 TFLOPS
ROPs11232
TMUs32848
Tensor Cores328no data
Ray Tracing Cores82no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length336 mm183 mm
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1219 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth936.2 GB/s102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA8.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2020 7 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 75 Watt

RTX 3090 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro W4000, on the other hand, has 366.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3090 and FirePro W4000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3090 is a desktop card while FirePro W4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GeForce RTX 3090
AMD FirePro W4000
FirePro W4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 78989 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.