ATI Rage PRO Turbo PCI vs GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking90not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency25.67no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Rage 3 (1997−1998)
GPU code nameGA104Rage 3 Turbo
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 January 2021 (3 years ago)1 March 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6144no data
Core clock speed1110 MHz75 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Wattno data
Texture fill rate296.60.08
Floating-point processing power18.98 TFLOPSno data
ROPs961
TMUs1921
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz75 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s600.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 January 2021 1 March 1997
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 8 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 350 nm

RTX 3080 Mobile has an age advantage of 23 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and Rage PRO Turbo PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is a notebook card while Rage PRO Turbo PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
ATI Rage PRO Turbo PCI
Rage PRO Turbo PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 782 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.