Riva TNT2 vs GeForce RTX 3070

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 and Riva TNT2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3070
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 220 Watt
58.00
+579900%

RTX 3070 outperforms Riva TNT2 by a whopping 579900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking421524
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.58no data
Power efficiency18.07no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameGA104NV5
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)12 October 1999 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5888no data
Core clock speed1500 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Wattno data
Texture fill rate317.40.25
Floating-point processing power20.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs962
TMUs1842
Tensor Cores184no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 4x
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s2.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x VGA
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)6.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 58.00
+579900%
Riva TNT2 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 22343
+744667%
Riva TNT2 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD149-0−1
1440p99-0−1
4K61-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.35no data
1440p5.04no data
4K8.18no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 147 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100 0−1
Battlefield 5 180−190 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 139 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 0−1
Hitman 3 109 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230 0−1
Metro Exodus 144 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 118 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 174 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87 0−1
Battlefield 5 180−190 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 126 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 0−1
Hitman 3 116 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230 0−1
Metro Exodus 144 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 255 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 178 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 102 0−1
Far Cry 5 110−120 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 0−1
Hitman 3 111 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 181 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 223 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 85 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 116 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 62 0−1
Far Cry 5 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 270−280 0−1
Hitman 3 96 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 146 0−1
Metro Exodus 101 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 175 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 0−1
Hitman 3 52 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220 0−1
Metro Exodus 107 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 38 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 58.00 0.01
Recency 1 September 2020 12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 250 nm

RTX 3070 has a 579900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3025% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Riva TNT2 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIA Riva TNT2
Riva TNT2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11315 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 18 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.