Quadro NVS 450 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 Ti with Quadro NVS 450, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060 Ti
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 200 Watt
53.13
+31153%

RTX 3060 Ti outperforms NVS 450 by a whopping 31153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking491410
Place by popularity23not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation69.05no data
Power efficiency18.200.33
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGA104G98
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 December 2020 (4 years ago)11 November 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $163.14

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 Ti and NVS 450 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48648
Core clock speed1410 MHz480 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate253.13.840
Floating-point processing power16.2 TFLOPS0.0192 TFLOPS
ROPs804
TMUs1528
Tensor Cores152no data
Ray Tracing Cores38no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s11.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.61.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Ti 53.13
+31153%
NVS 450 0.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 Ti 20469
+30914%
NVS 450 66

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD141-0−1
1440p78-0−1
4K48-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.83no data
1440p5.12no data
4K8.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 83 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 121 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95 0−1
Battlefield 5 160−170 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 81 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 0−1
Hitman 3 110−120 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210 0−1
Metro Exodus 140−150 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 200−210 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 196 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81 0−1
Battlefield 5 160−170 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 78 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 210−220 0−1
Hitman 3 110−120 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210 0−1
Metro Exodus 140−150 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 192 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 77 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 173 0−1
Hitman 3 110−120 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 140 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 174 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 77 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 52 0−1
Far Cry 5 60−65 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 260−270 0−1
Hitman 3 70−75 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 114 0−1
Metro Exodus 93 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 247 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50 0−1
Hitman 3 57 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220 0−1
Metro Exodus 75−80 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 25 0−1
Far Cry 5 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 103 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 33 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.13 0.17
Recency 1 December 2020 11 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 35 Watt

RTX 3060 Ti has a 31152.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 450, on the other hand, has 471.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro NVS 450 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Quadro NVS 450

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15530 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.