Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated78
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.47
Power efficiencyno data17.67
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA103SNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 February 2022 (2 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48642048
Core clock speed1410 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz2635 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate253.1337.3
Floating-point processing power16.2 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs8064
TMUs152128
Tensor Cores152no data
Ray Tracing Cores3832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s280.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 February 2022 10 May 2022
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 176 Watt

RX 6650 XT has an age advantage of 2 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 13.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103 and Radeon RX 6650 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 35 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3319 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.