Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.22no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA106Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843456
Core clock speed1320 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate199.0432.0
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs4896
TMUs112216
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores2854

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB28 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth240.0 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2022 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 158 Watt

PRO V710 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 7.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 688 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.