Arctic Sound-M vs GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking234not rated
Place by popularity45not in top-100
Power efficiency21.79no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGA107Arctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488192
Core clock speed712 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1057 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate67.65230.4
Floating-point processing power4.329 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs40128
TMUs64256
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s1.23 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 500 Watt

RTX 3050 Mobile has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is a notebook card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 4448 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.