RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023
6 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
25.13

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms RTX 3050 6GB Mobile by an impressive 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking214111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency28.7123.61
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGN20-P0-R 6 GBno data
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2023 (1 year ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603072
Core clock speed1237 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1492 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz16000 MHz
Shared memory--

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.13
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.61
+57.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 17421
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 28910
+65.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 11960
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 21379
+78.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 72486
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 115230
+59%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 4661
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 8095
+73.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72
−52.8%
110−120
+52.8%
1440p36
−52.8%
55−60
+52.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 81
−48.1%
120−130
+48.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
−56.3%
100−105
+56.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−57.5%
230−240
+57.5%
Hitman 3 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−56.5%
180−190
+56.5%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−51.2%
130−140
+51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−52.9%
130−140
+52.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−55.3%
160−170
+55.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−52.2%
70−75
+52.2%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−57.5%
230−240
+57.5%
Hitman 3 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−56.5%
180−190
+56.5%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−51.2%
130−140
+51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86
−51.2%
130−140
+51.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−57.4%
85−90
+57.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−55.3%
160−170
+55.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−51.2%
65−70
+51.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
−53.8%
60−65
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−55.2%
90−95
+55.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−57.5%
230−240
+57.5%
Hitman 3 50−55
−56.9%
80−85
+56.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
−56.5%
180−190
+56.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 76
−44.7%
110−120
+44.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−50%
75−80
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−55.3%
160−170
+55.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−53.8%
100−105
+53.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−55.2%
45−50
+55.2%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−52.8%
220−230
+52.8%
Hitman 3 30−33
−50%
45−50
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−53.8%
80−85
+53.8%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−56.3%
75−80
+56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
−49.1%
85−90
+49.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−48.6%
55−60
+48.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−56%
220−230
+56%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−54.8%
65−70
+54.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−40%
35−40
+40%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Hitman 3 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−55%
200−210
+55%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−38.5%
18−20
+38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%

This is how RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 53% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 53% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.13 39.61
Recency 6 January 2023 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has 91.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 57.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 659 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 19 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.