RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile

Place in the ranking	210	107
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	28.96	23.80
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GN20-P0-R 6 GB	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 January 2023 (1 year ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	3072
Core clock speed	1237 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1492 MHz	no data
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)	115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP)

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size

large

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	96 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	16000 MHz
Shared memory	-	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

12_2

12 Ultimate

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 25.09

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 39.49
+57.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 17421

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 28910
+65.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 11960

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 21379
+78.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 72486

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 115230
+59%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile 4661

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile 8095
+73.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	73 −50.7%	110−120 +50.7%
1440p	37 −48.6%	55−60 +48.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

81
−48.1%

120−130

+48.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −54.5%	85−90 +54.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −51.2%	65−70 +51.2%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −46.3%	120−130 +46.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −56.9%	80−85 +56.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	64 −56.3%	100−105 +56.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −55.2%	90−95 +55.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −50.7%	220−230 +50.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −56.9%	80−85 +56.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −56.5%	180−190 +56.5%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −51.2%	130−140 +51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −52.9%	130−140 +52.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −55.3%	160−170 +55.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −54.5%	85−90 +54.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −51.2%	65−70 +51.2%
Battlefield 5	80−85 −46.3%	120−130 +46.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −56.9%	80−85 +56.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 −52.2%	70−75 +52.2%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −55.2%	90−95 +55.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −50.7%	220−230 +50.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −56.9%	80−85 +56.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −56.5%	180−190 +56.5%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −51.2%	130−140 +51.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	86 −51.2%	130−140 +51.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −48.1%	80−85 +48.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −55.3%	160−170 +55.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −54.5%	85−90 +54.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −51.2%	65−70 +51.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −56.9%	80−85 +56.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	39 −53.8%	60−65 +53.8%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −55.2%	90−95 +55.2%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −50.7%	220−230 +50.7%
Hitman 3	50−55 −56.9%	80−85 +56.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 −56.5%	180−190 +56.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	76 −44.7%	110−120 +44.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50 −50%	75−80 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −55.3%	160−170 +55.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
−53.8%

100−105

+53.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −56.3%	75−80 +56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −44.7%	55−60 +44.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −53.8%	40−45 +53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −55.2%	45−50 +55.2%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 −52.8%	220−230 +52.8%
Hitman 3	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −53.8%	80−85 +53.8%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −56.3%	75−80 +56.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 −49.1%	85−90 +49.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	37 −48.6%	55−60 +48.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −56%	220−230 +56%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−54.8%

65−70
+54.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Hitman 3	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −55%	200−210 +55%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −48.1%	40−45 +48.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −40%	21−24 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −47.1%	50−55 +47.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−36.4%

30−33
+36.4%

This is how RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 51% faster in 1080p
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is 49% faster in 1440p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.09	39.49
Recency	6 January 2023	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	115 Watt

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has 91.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 57.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.