Arc Pro A60 vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile with Arc Pro A60, including specs and performance data.
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms Arc Pro A60 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 226 | 242 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 28.78 | 12.76 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | GN20-P0-R 6 GB | DG2-256 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2023 (2 years ago) | 6 June 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1237 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz | 2050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 11,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) | 130 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 262.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 64 |
| TMUs | no data | 128 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 256 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 384.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort 2.0 |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 71
+9.2%
| 65−70
−9.2%
|
| 1440p | 34
+13.3%
| 30−35
−13.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 65−70
+8.3%
|
60−65
−8.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+15%
|
40−45
−15%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 81
+8%
|
75−80
−8%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 65−70
+8.3%
|
60−65
−8.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+4.4%
|
90−95
−4.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+15%
|
40−45
−15%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 64
+6.7%
|
60−65
−6.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 83
+10.7%
|
75−80
−10.7%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+6.4%
|
110−120
−6.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+4.4%
|
90−95
−4.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 65−70
+11.7%
|
60−65
−11.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 90−95
+8.2%
|
85−90
−8.2%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+8.7%
|
150−160
−8.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 65−70
+8.3%
|
60−65
−8.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+4.4%
|
90−95
−4.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40
+14.3%
|
35−40
−14.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260
+6.3%
|
240−250
−6.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 46
+15%
|
40−45
−15%
|
| Dota 2 | 120−130
+10%
|
110−120
−10%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 76
+8.6%
|
70−75
−8.6%
|
| Fortnite | 110−120
+6.4%
|
110−120
−6.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+4.4%
|
90−95
−4.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 65−70
+11.7%
|
60−65
−11.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 91
+7.1%
|
85−90
−7.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+15.6%
|
45−50
−15.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 90−95
+8.2%
|
85−90
−8.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 91
+7.1%
|
85−90
−7.1%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+8.7%
|
150−160
−8.7%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+4.4%
|
90−95
−4.4%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+15%
|
40−45
−15%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 39
+11.4%
|
35−40
−11.4%
|
| Dota 2 | 120−130
+10%
|
110−120
−10%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 71
+9.2%
|
65−70
−9.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+4.4%
|
90−95
−4.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 65−70
+11.7%
|
60−65
−11.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 90−95
+8.2%
|
85−90
−8.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50
+11.1%
|
45−50
−11.1%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+8.7%
|
150−160
−8.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 110−120
+6.4%
|
110−120
−6.4%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170
+4.4%
|
160−170
−4.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40
+14.3%
|
35−40
−14.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+6.7%
|
30−33
−6.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+9.4%
|
160−170
−9.4%
|
| Valorant | 200−210
+6.8%
|
190−200
−6.8%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+10%
|
60−65
−10%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+9.5%
|
21−24
−9.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 52
+15.6%
|
45−50
−15.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+10.9%
|
55−60
−10.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+5%
|
40−45
−5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37
+5.7%
|
35−40
−5.7%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 55−60
+12%
|
50−55
−12%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 40−45
+10%
|
40−45
−10%
|
| Metro Exodus | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+16.7%
|
30−33
−16.7%
|
| Valorant | 130−140
+5.4%
|
130−140
−5.4%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+20%
|
30−33
−20%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 75−80
+11.4%
|
70−75
−11.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30
+12.5%
|
24−27
−12.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+5%
|
40−45
−5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 24−27
+4.2%
|
24−27
−4.2%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 24−27
+8.3%
|
24−27
−8.3%
|
This is how RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and Arc Pro A60 compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 9% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 13% faster in 1440p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.19 | 24.20 |
| Recency | 6 January 2023 | 6 June 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 130 Watt |
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has a 4.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 116.7% lower power consumption.
Arc Pro A60, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and Arc Pro A60.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is a notebook card while Arc Pro A60 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
