T400 4 GB vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile with T400 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
24.55
+150%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms T400 4 GB by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking229461
Place by popularity52not in top-100
Power efficiency28.1722.51
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGN20-P0TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048384
Core clock speed1238 MHz420 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data34.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.094 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+167%
24−27
−167%
1440p45
+181%
16−18
−181%
4K29
+190%
10−12
−190%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 42
+163%
16−18
−163%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+175%
24−27
−175%
Elden Ring 51
+183%
18−20
−183%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+171%
14−16
−171%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+156%
18−20
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 115
+156%
45−50
−156%
Metro Exodus 83
+177%
30−33
−177%
Red Dead Redemption 2 87
+190%
30−33
−190%
Valorant 133
+166%
50−55
−166%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+200%
10−11
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+164%
14−16
−164%
Dota 2 96
+174%
35−40
−174%
Elden Ring 86
+187%
30−33
−187%
Far Cry 5 73
+170%
27−30
−170%
Fortnite 120−130
+176%
45−50
−176%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+169%
35−40
−169%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+187%
30−33
−187%
Metro Exodus 57
+171%
21−24
−171%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+158%
60−65
−158%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+163%
30−33
−163%
Valorant 68
+152%
27−30
−152%
World of Tanks 250−260
+156%
100−105
−156%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Cyberpunk 2077 31
+158%
12−14
−158%
Dota 2 112
+180%
40−45
−180%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+153%
30−33
−153%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+170%
30−33
−170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+158%
60−65
−158%
Valorant 95−100
+183%
35−40
−183%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
Elden Ring 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+167%
18−20
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+169%
65−70
−169%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
World of Tanks 160−170
+151%
65−70
−151%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+183%
6−7
−183%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+163%
27−30
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+167%
21−24
−167%
Metro Exodus 52
+189%
18−20
−189%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+157%
14−16
−157%
Valorant 65−70
+175%
24−27
−175%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Dota 2 44
+175%
16−18
−175%
Elden Ring 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+175%
16−18
−175%
Metro Exodus 17
+183%
6−7
−183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+178%
27−30
−178%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+175%
16−18
−175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 62
+158%
24−27
−158%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%
Fortnite 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 34
+183%
12−14
−183%
Valorant 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and T400 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 167% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 181% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 190% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.55 9.81
Chip lithography 8 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 150.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

T400 4 GB, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the T400 4 GB in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook card while T400 4 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1403 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 57 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.