RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking108not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.20no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104BAD106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29444608
Core clock speed1380 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate292.6244.1
Floating-point processing power9.362 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs184144
Tensor Cores368144
Ray Tracing Cores4636

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 January 2019 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has an age advantage of 4 years, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 30.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile and RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation
RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 145 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.