ATI Radeon IGP 350M vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	44	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.32	no data
Power efficiency	15.71	no data
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	TU102	RS200
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	20 September 2018 (6 years ago)	5 October 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	no data
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	183 MHz
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	18,600 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	420.2	0.37
Floating-point processing power	13.45 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	88	2
TMUs	272	2
Tensor Cores	544	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	68	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	352 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	616.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

+

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	7.0
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	20 September 2018	5 October 2002
Chip lithography	12 nm	180 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---