Qualcomm Adreno 685 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Place in the ranking	44	824
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.29	no data
Power efficiency	15.72	25.30
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	no data
GPU code name	TU102	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	20 September 2018 (6 years ago)	6 December 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4352	no data
Core clock speed	1350 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	18,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	7 Watt
Texture fill rate	420.2	no data
Floating-point processing power	13.45 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	88	no data
TMUs	272	no data
Tensor Cores	544	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	68	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	no data
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	no data
Memory bus width	352 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	616.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	no data
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Ti 56.35
+2119%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 2.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Ti 21737
+2120%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 979

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 Ti 47166
+2348%

Qualcomm Adreno 685 1927

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	165 +2257%	7−8 −2257%
1440p	119 +2280%	5−6 −2280%
4K	89 +2125%	4−5 −2125%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	6.05	no data
1440p	8.39	no data
4K	11.22	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

100−110
+2020%

5−6

−2020%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	125 +1289%	9−10 −1289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	107	0−1
Battlefield 5	244 +6000%	4−5 −6000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +1429%	7−8 −1429%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +2020%	5−6 −2020%
Far Cry 5	163 +3160%	5−6 −3160%
Far Cry New Dawn	197 +2714%	7−8 −2714%
Forza Horizon 4	346 +2562%	12−14 −2562%
Hitman 3	161 +2200%	7−8 −2200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	285 +1257%	21−24 −1257%
Metro Exodus	144 +7100%	2−3 −7100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	106 +1667%	6−7 −1667%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	216 +1700%	12−14 −1700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	266 +600%	35−40 −600%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	181 +1911%	9−10 −1911%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	91	0−1
Battlefield 5	224 +5500%	4−5 −5500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +1429%	7−8 −1429%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +2020%	5−6 −2020%
Far Cry 5	132 +2540%	5−6 −2540%
Far Cry New Dawn	152 +2071%	7−8 −2071%
Forza Horizon 4	321 +2369%	12−14 −2369%
Hitman 3	156 +2129%	7−8 −2129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	267 +1171%	21−24 −1171%
Metro Exodus	144 +7100%	2−3 −7100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +1783%	6−7 −1783%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 +1775%	12−14 −1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +736%	14−16 −736%
Watch Dogs: Legion	255 +571%	35−40 −571%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	82 +811%	9−10 −811%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	103 +1371%	7−8 −1371%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +2020%	5−6 −2020%
Far Cry 5	91 +1720%	5−6 −1720%
Forza Horizon 4	168 +1192%	12−14 −1192%
Hitman 3	139 +1886%	7−8 −1886%
Horizon Zero Dawn	202 +862%	21−24 −862%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 +1775%	12−14 −1775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	135 +864%	14−16 −864%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90 +137%	35−40 −137%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

104
+1633%

6−7

−1633%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	166 +4050%	4−5 −4050%
Far Cry New Dawn	112 +2700%	4−5 −2700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	72 +3500%	2−3 −3500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	67 +2133%	3−4 −2133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	82 +4000%	2−3 −4000%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +5300%	1−2 −5300%
Far Cry 5	84 +2700%	3−4 −2700%
Forza Horizon 4	313 +2136%	14−16 −2136%
Hitman 3	100 +1150%	8−9 −1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	162 +2214%	7−8 −2214%
Metro Exodus	98 +2350%	4−5 −2350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 +2383%	6−7 −2383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +4600%	2−3 −4600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	251 +1469%	16−18 −1469%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

105
+1650%

6−7

−1650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	87 +8600%	1−2 −8600%
Far Cry New Dawn	66 +3200%	2−3 −3200%
Hitman 3	59 +2850%	2−3 −2850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130 +2500%	5−6 −2500%
Metro Exodus	111 +2120%	5−6 −2120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	98 +2350%	4−5 −2350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50 +2400%	2−3 −2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	46 +4500%	1−2 −4500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	52 +5100%	1−2 −5100%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +2400%	1−2 −2400%
Far Cry 5	50 +4900%	1−2 −4900%
Forza Horizon 4	107 +2575%	4−5 −2575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +2700%	3−4 −2700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	44	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

73
+1725%

4−5

−1725%

This is how RTX 2080 Ti and Qualcomm Adreno 685 compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Ti is 2257% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Ti is 2280% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 Ti is 2125% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2080 Ti is 8600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 2080 Ti surpassed Qualcomm Adreno 685 in all 57 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	56.35	2.54
Recency	20 September 2018	6 December 2018
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	7 Watt

RTX 2080 Ti has a 2118.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm Adreno 685, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 3471.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 685 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is a desktop card while Qualcomm Adreno 685 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.