UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super

Place in the ranking	54	853
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	32.20	no data
Power efficiency	14.15	15.76
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code name	TU104	Gen. 11
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	23 July 2019 (5 years ago)	11 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	24
Core clock speed	1650 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1815 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate	348.5	no data
Floating-point processing power	11.15 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	192	no data
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	no data
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1937 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	495.9 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	no data
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Super 50.73
+2145%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 2.26

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 Super 40963
+2710%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1458

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 Super 27398
+2377%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1106

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 Super 140388
+1574%

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 8388

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	140 +1173%	11 −1173%
1440p	94 +2250%	4−5 −2250%
4K	70 +2233%	3−4 −2233%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.99	no data
1440p	7.44	no data
4K	9.99	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

90−95
+1760%

5−6

−1760%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	99 +1138%	8−9 −1138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	94 +2250%	4−5 −2250%
Battlefield 5	194 +9600%	2−3 −9600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	127 +2017%	6−7 −2017%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +1760%	5−6 −1760%
Far Cry 5	141 +3425%	4−5 −3425%
Far Cry New Dawn	170 +2733%	6−7 −2733%
Forza Horizon 4	266 +2560%	10−11 −2560%
Hitman 3	113 +1514%	7−8 −1514%
Horizon Zero Dawn	301 +1484%	18−20 −1484%
Metro Exodus	144	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +2340%	5−6 −2340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	198 +1880%	10−11 −1880%
Watch Dogs: Legion	227 +531%	35−40 −531%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	142 +1675%	8−9 −1675%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 +2533%	3−4 −2533%
Battlefield 5	182 +9000%	2−3 −9000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120 +1900%	6−7 −1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +1760%	5−6 −1760%
Far Cry 5	112 +2700%	4−5 −2700%
Far Cry New Dawn	128 +2033%	6−7 −2033%
Forza Horizon 4	258 +2480%	10−11 −2480%
Hitman 3	116 +1557%	7−8 −1557%
Horizon Zero Dawn	283 +1389%	18−20 −1389%
Metro Exodus	144	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 +1900%	5−6 −1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	225 +2150%	10−11 −2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +708%	12−14 −708%
Watch Dogs: Legion	211 +486%	35−40 −486%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68 +750%	8−9 −750%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70 +2233%	3−4 −2233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90 +1400%	6−7 −1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	89 +1680%	5−6 −1680%
Far Cry 5	79 +1875%	4−5 −1875%
Forza Horizon 4	133 +1230%	10−11 −1230%
Hitman 3	108 +1443%	7−8 −1443%
Horizon Zero Dawn	162 +753%	18−20 −753%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	189 +1790%	10−11 −1790%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	109 +2625%	4 −2625%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75 +108%	35−40 −108%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

118
+2260%

5−6

−2260%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	134 +4367%	3−4 −4367%
Far Cry New Dawn	93 +3000%	3−4 −3000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 +2800%	2−3 −2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	57 +2750%	2−3 −2750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65 +6400%	1−2 −6400%
Cyberpunk 2077	57 +5600%	1−2 −5600%
Far Cry 5	70 +3400%	2−3 −3400%
Forza Horizon 4	249 +2390%	10−11 −2390%
Hitman 3	79 +1029%	7−8 −1029%
Horizon Zero Dawn	127 +2017%	6−7 −2017%
Metro Exodus	90 +2150%	4−5 −2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	141 +2250%	6−7 −2250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 +8000%	1−2 −8000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	211 +1658%	12−14 −1658%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

107
+2040%

5−6

−2040%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	62	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	53 +5200%	1−2 −5200%
Hitman 3	40−45 +4100%	1−2 −4100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	131 +2520%	5−6 −2520%
Metro Exodus	89 +2867%	3−4 −2867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 +2533%	3−4 −2533%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +1950%	2−3 −1950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	36 +3500%	1−2 −3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	39 +3800%	1−2 −3800%
Cyberpunk 2077	31 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Far Cry 5	40 +3900%	1−2 −3900%
Forza Horizon 4	81 +2600%	3−4 −2600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	82 +2633%	3−4 −2633%
Watch Dogs: Legion	34	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60
+1900%

3−4

−1900%

This is how RTX 2080 Super and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Super is 1173% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Super is 2250% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 Super is 2233% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 Super is 9600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 2080 Super surpassed UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	50.73	2.26
Recency	23 July 2019	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	12 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	4 Watt

RTX 2080 Super has a 2144.7% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 6150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Super is a desktop card while UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.