Quadro RTX 4000 vs GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q with Quadro RTX 4000, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Max-Q
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
36.06

RTX 4000 outperforms RTX 2080 Max-Q by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking135109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.25
Power efficiency30.9017.01
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104BTU104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)13 November 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29442304
Core clock speed735 MHz1005 MHz
Boost clock speed1095 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate201.5222.5
Floating-point processing power6.447 TFLOPS7.119 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs184144
Tensor Cores368288
Ray Tracing Cores4636

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s416.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Max-Q 36.06
RTX 4000 39.71
+10.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Max-Q 13894
RTX 4000 15300
+10.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD115
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%
1440p85
−5.9%
90−95
+5.9%
4K46
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data7.49
1440pno data9.99
4Kno data17.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Battlefield 5 142
−5.6%
150−160
+5.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Far Cry 5 117
−2.6%
120−130
+2.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 139
−7.9%
150−160
+7.9%
Forza Horizon 4 271
−7%
290−300
+7%
Hitman 3 75−80
−5.3%
80−85
+5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−4.6%
160−170
+4.6%
Metro Exodus 137
−9.5%
150−160
+9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 174
−9.2%
190−200
+9.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−4.8%
130−140
+4.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
−3.9%
80−85
+3.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Battlefield 5 130
−7.7%
140−150
+7.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 92
−8.7%
100−105
+8.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Far Cry 5 90
−5.6%
95−100
+5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 102
−7.8%
110−120
+7.8%
Forza Horizon 4 223
−7.6%
240−250
+7.6%
Hitman 3 75−80
−5.3%
80−85
+5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−4.6%
160−170
+4.6%
Metro Exodus 120
−8.3%
130−140
+8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 64
−9.4%
70−75
+9.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−8.5%
140−150
+8.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−6.7%
80−85
+6.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−4.8%
130−140
+4.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
−7.1%
60−65
+7.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
−5.6%
75−80
+5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Far Cry 5 67
−4.5%
70−75
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−9.3%
200−210
+9.3%
Hitman 3 75−80
−5.3%
80−85
+5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
−4.6%
160−170
+4.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
−8.5%
140−150
+8.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78
−9%
85−90
+9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
−4.8%
130−140
+4.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 82
−9.8%
90−95
+9.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 88
−8%
95−100
+8%
Far Cry New Dawn 69
−8.7%
75−80
+8.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Forza Horizon 4 224
−7.1%
240−250
+7.1%
Hitman 3 45−50
−8.7%
50−55
+8.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−3.9%
80−85
+3.9%
Metro Exodus 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
−4.7%
90−95
+4.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
−9.9%
200−210
+9.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 41
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 40
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hitman 3 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
−4.7%
180−190
+4.7%
Metro Exodus 36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−9.4%
35−40
+9.4%

This is how RTX 2080 Max-Q and RTX 4000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 is 6% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 is 9% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.06 39.71
Recency 29 January 2019 13 November 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 160 Watt

RTX 2080 Max-Q has an age advantage of 2 months, and 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000, on the other hand, has a 10.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 194 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 483 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.