RTX A4500 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms RTX 2070 Mobile by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 154 | 82 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 20.64 | 21.99 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | TU106B | GA104 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 29 January 2019 (6 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 5888 |
| Core clock speed | 1305 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 17,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 213.8 | 276.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | 6.843 TFLOPS | 17.66 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 |
| TMUs | 144 | 184 |
| Tensor Cores | 288 | 184 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 46 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | 8.6 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 123
−22%
| 150−160
+22%
|
| 1440p | 80
−25%
| 100−110
+25%
|
| 4K | 50
−20%
| 60−65
+20%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 90−95
−34%
|
120−130
+34%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
−42%
|
95−100
+42%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
−34.2%
|
95−100
+34.2%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 90−95
−34%
|
120−130
+34%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 120
−15%
|
130−140
+15%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
−42%
|
95−100
+42%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
−34.2%
|
95−100
+34.2%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 122
−4.9%
|
120−130
+4.9%
|
| Fortnite | 188
+5.6%
|
170−180
−5.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 113
−41.6%
|
160−170
+41.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 90−95
−30.9%
|
120−130
+30.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 196
+21.7%
|
160−170
−21.7%
|
| Valorant | 234
−1.3%
|
230−240
+1.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 90−95
−34%
|
120−130
+34%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 134
−3%
|
130−140
+3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
−42%
|
95−100
+42%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
−0.7%
|
270−280
+0.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
−34.2%
|
95−100
+34.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 124
−17.7%
|
140−150
+17.7%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 113
−13.3%
|
120−130
+13.3%
|
| Fortnite | 149
−19.5%
|
170−180
+19.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 112
−42.9%
|
160−170
+42.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 90−95
−30.9%
|
120−130
+30.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 115
−16.5%
|
130−140
+16.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 69
−44.9%
|
100−105
+44.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 173
+7.5%
|
160−170
−7.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 142
−5.6%
|
150−160
+5.6%
|
| Valorant | 230
−3%
|
230−240
+3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 121
−14%
|
130−140
+14%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 65−70
−42%
|
95−100
+42%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 70−75
−34.2%
|
95−100
+34.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 117
−24.8%
|
140−150
+24.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 106
−20.8%
|
120−130
+20.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 94
−70.2%
|
160−170
+70.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 90−95
−27.7%
|
120−130
+27.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130
−23.8%
|
160−170
+23.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 74
−103%
|
150−160
+103%
|
| Valorant | 154
−53.9%
|
230−240
+53.9%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 141
−26.2%
|
170−180
+26.2%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
−28.8%
|
280−290
+28.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 60−65
−34.9%
|
85−90
+34.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 42
−47.6%
|
60−65
+47.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
| Valorant | 229
−16.6%
|
260−270
+16.6%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 92
−13%
|
100−110
+13%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
−29.6%
|
35−40
+29.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
−42.9%
|
50−55
+42.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 76
−31.6%
|
100−105
+31.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 85−90
−37.5%
|
120−130
+37.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−22.8%
|
70−75
+22.8%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
−40.4%
|
80−85
+40.4%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 94
−18.1%
|
110−120
+18.1%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 24−27
−30.8%
|
30−35
+30.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 65−70
−41.5%
|
90−95
+41.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 26
−46.2%
|
35−40
+46.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50
−34%
|
65−70
+34%
|
| Valorant | 202
−24.3%
|
250−260
+24.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 52
−26.9%
|
65−70
+26.9%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
−40%
|
21−24
+40%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
−43.8%
|
21−24
+43.8%
|
| Dota 2 | 95−100
−18.4%
|
110−120
+18.4%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40
−40%
|
55−60
+40%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
−39.7%
|
80−85
+39.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35
−21.2%
|
40−45
+21.2%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 46
−28.3%
|
55−60
+28.3%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 46
−21.7%
|
55−60
+21.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
This is how RTX 2070 Mobile and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX A4500 Mobile is 22% faster in 1080p
- RTX A4500 Mobile is 25% faster in 1440p
- RTX A4500 Mobile is 20% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2070 Mobile is 22% faster.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 103% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 2070 Mobile is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
- RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 59 tests (92%)
- there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 34.20 | 44.35 |
| Recency | 29 January 2019 | 22 March 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 140 Watt |
RTX 2070 Mobile has 21.7% lower power consumption.
RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 29.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
