GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK vs RTX 2070 Mobile

Place in the ranking	149	243
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	3.88
Power efficiency	20.75	6.41
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	TU106B	GK110B
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)	18 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2880
Core clock speed	1305 MHz	889 MHz
Boost clock speed	1485 MHz	980 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	213.8	235.2
Floating-point processing power	6.843 TFLOPS	5.645 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	48
TMUs	144	240
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	36	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	336 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	no data	4 displays
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D	-	+
3D Gaming	-	+
3D Vision	-	+
3D Vision Live	-	+
VR Ready	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA	7.5	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Mobile 34.66
+48.9%

GTX TITAN BLACK 23.28

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 Mobile 20392
+74.4%

GTX TITAN BLACK 11690

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120 +50%	80−85 −50%
1440p	75 +50%	50−55 −50%
4K	48 +60%	30−35 −60%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	12.49
1440p	no data	19.98
4K	no data	33.30

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +55.6%	45−50 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	70−75 +62.2%	45−50 −62.2%
Elden Ring	110−120 +58.7%	75−80 −58.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	95 +58.3%	60−65 −58.3%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +55.6%	45−50 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	38 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Forza Horizon 4	183 +52.5%	120−130 −52.5%
Metro Exodus	94 +56.7%	60−65 −56.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	106 +51.4%	70−75 −51.4%
Valorant	170 +54.5%	110−120 −54.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	135 +50%	90−95 −50%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +55.6%	45−50 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	31 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
Dota 2	118 +57.3%	75−80 −57.3%
Elden Ring	110−120 +58.7%	75−80 −58.7%
Far Cry 5	79 +58%	50−55 −58%
Fortnite	150−160 +58%	100−105 −58%
Forza Horizon 4	149 +49%	100−105 −49%
Grand Theft Auto V	115 +53.3%	75−80 −53.3%
Metro Exodus	73 +62.2%	45−50 −62.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	248 +55%	160−170 −55%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120−130 +50%	80−85 −50%
Valorant	102 +56.9%	65−70 −56.9%
World of Tanks	270−280 +54.4%	180−190 −54.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	83 +50.9%	55−60 −50.9%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +55.6%	45−50 −55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
Dota 2	117 +56%	75−80 −56%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +51.7%	60−65 −51.7%
Forza Horizon 4	125 +56.3%	80−85 −56.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	104 +60%	65−70 −60%
Valorant	154 +54%	100−105 −54%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	60−65 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
Elden Ring	65−70 +51.1%	45−50 −51.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 +57.5%	40−45 −57.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +59.1%	110−120 −59.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
World of Tanks	220−230 +57.9%	140−150 −57.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	72 +60%	45−50 −60%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +57.1%	21−24 −57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +70%	10−11 −70%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +57.1%	70−75 −57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +49.2%	65−70 −49.2%
Metro Exodus	74 +64.4%	45−50 −64.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +62.9%	35−40 −62.9%
Valorant	104 +60%	65−70 −60%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Dota 2	65−70 +62.5%	40−45 −62.5%
Elden Ring	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +62.5%	40−45 −62.5%
Metro Exodus	26 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	118 +57.3%	75−80 −57.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	23 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +62.5%	40−45 −62.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	38 +58.3%	24−27 −58.3%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +66.7%	21−24 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 +60%	5−6 −60%
Dota 2	65−70 +62.5%	40−45 −62.5%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +63.3%	30−33 −63.3%
Fortnite	48 +60%	30−33 −60%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +60%	35−40 −60%
Valorant	55 +57.1%	35−40 −57.1%

This is how RTX 2070 Mobile and GTX TITAN BLACK compete in popular games:

RTX 2070 Mobile is 50% faster in 1080p
RTX 2070 Mobile is 50% faster in 1440p
RTX 2070 Mobile is 60% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	34.66	23.28
Recency	29 January 2019	18 February 2014
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	250 Watt

RTX 2070 Mobile has a 48.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 117.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.