GeForce 9400 GT vs RTX 2070 Mobile
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 147 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | N18E-G2 TU106 | G96C |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 January 2019 (5 years ago) | 27 August 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $79.99 |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 16 |
| CUDA cores | no data | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 314 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Texture fill rate | 213.8 | 4.400 |
| Floating-point performance | 6.843 gflops | 0.0448 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | no data | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Height | no data | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
| SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI |
| Multi monitor support | no data | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
| Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2019 | 27 August 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 50 Watt |
RTX 2070 Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.
9400 GT, on the other hand, has 130% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and GeForce 9400 GT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce 9400 GT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
