Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
36.64
+48.5%

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms Pro W6600M by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking128220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameN18E-G2RNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601792
Core clock speed1140 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1380 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate220.8325.1
Floating-point performance7.066 gflops10.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14002 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD122
+52.5%
80−85
−52.5%
1440p77
+54%
50−55
−54%
4K41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+38.7%
75−80
−38.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 83
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+3.5%
110−120
−3.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 115
+62%
70−75
−62%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry 5 146
+87.2%
75−80
−87.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 162
+84.1%
85−90
−84.1%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+1.7%
180−190
−1.7%
Hitman 3 105
+41.9%
70−75
−41.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+3.3%
150−160
−3.3%
Metro Exodus 144
+24.1%
110−120
−24.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+40%
85−90
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+4.8%
120−130
−4.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+4%
75−80
−4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+18.3%
60−65
−18.3%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+3.5%
110−120
−3.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
+42.3%
70−75
−42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry 5 119
+52.6%
75−80
−52.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 112
+27.3%
85−90
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+1.7%
180−190
−1.7%
Hitman 3 104
+40.5%
70−75
−40.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+3.3%
150−160
−3.3%
Metro Exodus 144
+24.1%
110−120
−24.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+14.1%
85−90
−14.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+4.8%
120−130
−4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+4.1%
70−75
−4.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+2.5%
120−130
−2.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
−19%
75−80
+19%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75
+5.6%
70−75
−5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry 5 83
+6.4%
75−80
−6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+1.7%
180−190
−1.7%
Hitman 3 92
+24.3%
70−75
−24.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
−24%
150−160
+24%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+4.8%
120−130
−4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+19.2%
70−75
−19.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
−100%
120−130
+100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+27.1%
85−90
−27.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+4.5%
65−70
−4.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 75
+38.9%
50−55
−38.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+47.4%
35−40
−47.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+5.3%
35−40
−5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+7.7%
24−27
−7.7%
Far Cry 5 60
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+3.5%
200−210
−3.5%
Hitman 3 61
+38.6%
40−45
−38.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+4%
75−80
−4%
Metro Exodus 89
+34.8%
65−70
−34.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+4.8%
80−85
−4.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+6.1%
45−50
−6.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+2.8%
170−180
−2.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+40%
60−65
−40%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+41.4%
27−30
−41.4%
Hitman 3 30−33
+7.1%
27−30
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+2.4%
160−170
−2.4%
Metro Exodus 67
+55.8%
40−45
−55.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+43.9%
40−45
−43.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 36
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
+45.5%
21−24
−45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Far Cry 5 31
+55%
20−22
−55%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+4.2%
45−50
−4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+4.3%
45−50
−4.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 43
+38.7%
30−35
−38.7%

This is how RTX 2070 Super Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 53% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 54% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 52% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 87% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.64 24.68
Recency 2 April 2020 8 June 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 90 Watt

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has a 48.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 27.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W6600M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 391 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.