RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Place in performance ranking	129	47
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	N18E-G2R	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	6144
Core clock speed	1140 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	220.8	299.5
Floating-point performance	7.066 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	14002 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	280.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	122 −47.5%	180−190 +47.5%
1440p	76 −44.7%	110−120 +44.7%
4K	45 −44.4%	65−70 +44.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

−42.9%

90−95
+42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 −44.2%	150−160 +44.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	83 −44.6%	120−130 +44.6%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −44.1%	170−180 +44.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	115 −39.1%	160−170 +39.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −42.9%	90−95 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	146 −43.8%	210−220 +43.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	162 −42%	230−240 +42%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −46.7%	270−280 +46.7%
Hitman 3	105 −42.9%	150−160 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −41.9%	220−230 +41.9%
Metro Exodus	144 −45.8%	210−220 +45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	119 −42.9%	170−180 +42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −43.9%	190−200 +43.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −44%	180−190 +44%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −41%	110−120 +41%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 −40.8%	100−105 +40.8%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −44.1%	170−180 +44.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	101 −38.6%	140−150 +38.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −42.9%	90−95 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	119 −42.9%	170−180 +42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	112 −42.9%	160−170 +42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −46.7%	270−280 +46.7%
Hitman 3	104 −44.2%	150−160 +44.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −41.9%	220−230 +41.9%
Metro Exodus	144 −45.8%	210−220 +45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	97 −44.3%	140−150 +44.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −43.9%	190−200 +43.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −44.7%	110−120 +44.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −44%	180−190 +44%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	63 −42.9%	90−95 +42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	61 −47.5%	90−95 +47.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	75 −46.7%	110−120 +46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −42.9%	90−95 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	83 −44.6%	120−130 +44.6%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −46.7%	270−280 +46.7%
Hitman 3	92 −41.3%	130−140 +41.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	121 −40.5%	170−180 +40.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 −43.9%	190−200 +43.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	87 −37.9%	120−130 +37.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	61 −47.5%	90−95 +47.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

108

−38.9%

150−160
+38.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −42.9%	100−105 +42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	75 −46.7%	110−120 +46.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 −42.9%	80−85 +42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −37.5%	55−60 +37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55 −45.5%	80−85 +45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%
Far Cry 5	60 −41.7%	85−90 +41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 −44.9%	300−310 +44.9%
Hitman 3	61 −47.5%	90−95 +47.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 −41%	110−120 +41%
Metro Exodus	89 −46.1%	130−140 +46.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −37.9%	120−130 +37.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −44.2%	75−80 +44.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 −46.7%	270−280 +46.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

84
−42.9%

120−130

+42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −38.9%	50−55 +38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 −46.3%	60−65 +46.3%
Hitman 3	30−33 −33.3%	40−45 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −44.5%	250−260 +44.5%
Metro Exodus	67 −41.8%	95−100 +41.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	59 −44.1%	85−90 +44.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	36 −38.9%	50−55 +38.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −36.4%	30−33 +36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	32 −40.6%	45−50 +40.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	31 −45.2%	45−50 +45.2%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −40%	70−75 +40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −42.9%	70−75 +42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 −40%	35−40 +40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−39.5%

60−65
+39.5%

This is how RTX 2070 Super Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 48% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 45% faster in 1440p
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 44% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	36.62	54.06
Recency	2 April 2020	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	115 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 47.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 64.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.