T600 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q with T600, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
35.59
+112%

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms T600 by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking135319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency30.8129.00
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU104TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560640
Core clock speed930 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate184.853.40
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPS1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16040
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth352.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 35.59
+112%
T600 16.75

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 13735
+112%
T600 6464

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 27724
+219%
T600 8694

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 65101
T600 344838
+430%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 20873
+219%
T600 6552

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 126747
+210%
T600 40917

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 461648
+51.5%
T600 304731

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+83.6%
55
−83.6%
1440p71
+196%
24
−196%
4K47
+114%
22
−114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+138%
24−27
−138%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 99
+161%
35−40
−161%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
+189%
27−30
−189%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+109%
55−60
−109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
+197%
30−35
−197%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+138%
24−27
−138%
Far Cry 5 127
+226%
35−40
−226%
Far Cry New Dawn 137
+204%
45−50
−204%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+70.1%
100−110
−70.1%
Hitman 3 103
+222%
30−35
−222%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+83.1%
80−85
−83.1%
Metro Exodus 144
+153%
55−60
−153%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+137%
45−50
−137%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+133%
55−60
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+48.2%
80−85
−48.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+100%
35−40
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+150%
27−30
−150%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+109%
55−60
−109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 91
+168%
30−35
−168%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+138%
24−27
−138%
Far Cry 5 108
+177%
35−40
−177%
Far Cry New Dawn 97
+116%
45−50
−116%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+70.1%
100−110
−70.1%
Hitman 3 102
+219%
30−35
−219%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+83.1%
80−85
−83.1%
Metro Exodus 142
+149%
55−60
−149%
Red Dead Redemption 2 91
+97.8%
45−50
−97.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+151%
51
−151%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+89.7%
35−40
−89.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+48.2%
80−85
−48.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+63.2%
35−40
−63.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+114%
27−30
−114%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
+100%
30−35
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+138%
24−27
−138%
Far Cry 5 76
+94.9%
35−40
−94.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+70.1%
100−110
−70.1%
Hitman 3 86
+169%
30−35
−169%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
+167%
39
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+184%
45
−184%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+178%
27
−178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−40.7%
80−85
+40.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+100%
45−50
−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+113%
30−35
−113%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
+146%
24−27
−146%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
+176%
16−18
−176%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+178%
18−20
−178%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Far Cry 5 54
+184%
18−20
−184%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+126%
90−95
−126%
Hitman 3 45−50
+125%
20−22
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+185%
27
−185%
Metro Exodus 75
+150%
30−33
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+166%
32
−166%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+77.5%
100−110
−77.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+154%
27−30
−154%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+192%
12−14
−192%
Hitman 3 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+101%
85−90
−101%
Metro Exodus 61
+259%
16−18
−259%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+219%
16
−219%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32
+220%
10−11
−220%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
+222%
9−10
−222%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry 5 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+167%
18
−167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 36
+140%
14−16
−140%

This is how RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and T600 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 84% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 196% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 267% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 is 41% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • T600 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.59 16.75
Recency 2 April 2020 6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 40 Watt

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q has a 112.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the T600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a notebook card while T600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIA T600
T600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 503 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 679 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.