Apple M1 8-Core GPU vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and Apple M1 8-Core GPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
35.63
+145%

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a whopping 145% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency31.06no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU104no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25608
Core clock speed930 MHz1278 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Wattno data
Texture fill rate184.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.914 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs160no data
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1375 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth352.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.140-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 35.63
+145%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 14.54

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 461648
+64.8%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 280200

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD105
+275%
28
−275%
1440p69
+156%
27−30
−156%
4K42
+163%
16−18
−163%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+182%
21−24
−182%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 99
+209%
30−35
−209%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
+252%
21−24
−252%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+150%
45−50
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 101
+261%
27−30
−261%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+182%
21−24
−182%
Far Cry 5 127
+285%
30−35
−285%
Far Cry New Dawn 137
+251%
35−40
−251%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+97.8%
90−95
−97.8%
Hitman 3 103
+281%
27−30
−281%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+111%
70−75
−111%
Metro Exodus 144
+206%
45−50
−206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+179%
35−40
−179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+178%
45−50
−178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+61.8%
75−80
−61.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+138%
30−35
−138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+204%
21−24
−204%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+150%
45−50
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 91
+225%
27−30
−225%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+182%
21−24
−182%
Far Cry 5 108
+227%
30−35
−227%
Far Cry New Dawn 97
+149%
35−40
−149%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+97.8%
90−95
−97.8%
Hitman 3 102
+278%
27−30
−278%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+111%
70−75
−111%
Metro Exodus 142
+202%
45−50
−202%
Red Dead Redemption 2 91
+133%
35−40
−133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+178%
45−50
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+118%
30−35
−118%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+61.8%
75−80
−61.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+93.8%
30−35
−93.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+161%
21−24
−161%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 68
+143%
27−30
−143%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+182%
21−24
−182%
Far Cry 5 76
+130%
30−35
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+97.8%
90−95
−97.8%
Hitman 3 86
+219%
27−30
−219%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
+44.4%
70−75
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+178%
45−50
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75
+121%
30−35
−121%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−28.8%
75−80
+28.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+136%
35−40
−136%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+152%
27−30
−152%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
+191%
21−24
−191%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
+236%
14−16
−236%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+245%
10−12
−245%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50
+233%
14−16
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+286%
7−8
−286%
Far Cry 5 54
+238%
16−18
−238%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+182%
70−75
−182%
Hitman 3 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+166%
27−30
−166%
Metro Exodus 75
+213%
24−27
−213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+254%
24−27
−254%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+233%
14−16
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+108%
85−90
−108%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+209%
21−24
−209%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+250%
10−11
−250%
Hitman 3 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+148%
65−70
−148%
Metro Exodus 61
+369%
12−14
−369%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+292%
12−14
−292%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 32
+300%
8−9
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+214%
7−8
−214%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 28
+250%
8−9
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+158%
18−20
−158%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+269%
12−14
−269%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 36
+177%
12−14
−177%

This is how RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and Apple M1 8-Core GPU compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 275% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 156% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 163% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is 450% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 29% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.63 14.54
Recency 2 April 2020 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q has a 145% higher aggregate performance score.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.8 503 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 915 votes

Rate Apple M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.