NVS 2100M vs GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameTU106BGT218
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date16 June 2020 (4 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed900 MHz535 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rate162.04.280
Floating-point processing power5.184 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs644
TMUs1448
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth352.0 GB/s12.64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.51.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2020 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 11 Watt

RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 2100M, on the other hand, has 945.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh and NVS 2100M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook graphics card while NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh
NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 8 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.