Arc A550M vs GeForce RTX 2060

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 with Arc A550M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
36.70
+49.8%

RTX 2060 outperforms Arc A550M by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking132225
Place by popularity16not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.72no data
Power efficiency15.7828.08
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU106DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19202048
Core clock speed1365 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate201.6262.4
Floating-point processing power6.451 TFLOPS8.397 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs120128
Tensor Cores240256
Ray Tracing Cores3016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 36.70
+49.8%
Arc A550M 24.50

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2060 19338
+34.8%
Arc A550M 14350

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
+58.7%
75−80
−58.7%
1440p77
+54%
50−55
−54%
4K47
+56.7%
30−35
−56.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.93no data
1440p4.53no data
4K7.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92
+76.9%
50−55
−76.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+92.7%
40−45
−92.7%
Battlefield 5 157
+101%
75−80
−101%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 106
+116%
45−50
−116%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%
Far Cry 5 114
+107%
55−60
−107%
Far Cry New Dawn 128
+103%
60−65
−103%
Forza Horizon 4 205
+45.4%
140−150
−45.4%
Hitman 3 98
+104%
45−50
−104%
Horizon Zero Dawn 248
+123%
110−120
−123%
Metro Exodus 144
+75.6%
80−85
−75.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+75.8%
60−65
−75.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 191
+139%
80−85
−139%
Watch Dogs: Legion 254
+151%
100−110
−151%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131
+152%
50−55
−152%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+56.1%
40−45
−56.1%
Battlefield 5 140
+79.5%
75−80
−79.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 96
+95.9%
45−50
−95.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%
Far Cry 5 91
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 95
+50.8%
60−65
−50.8%
Forza Horizon 4 194
+37.6%
140−150
−37.6%
Hitman 3 96
+100%
45−50
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 247
+123%
110−120
−123%
Metro Exodus 140
+70.7%
80−85
−70.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 103
+66.1%
60−65
−66.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+65%
80−85
−65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+46.2%
50−55
−46.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 244
+142%
100−110
−142%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+7.7%
50−55
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
+44.9%
45−50
−44.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%
Far Cry 5 70
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 105
−34.3%
140−150
+34.3%
Hitman 3 81
+68.8%
45−50
−68.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120
+8.1%
110−120
−8.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+65%
80−85
−65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+40.4%
50−55
−40.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45
−124%
100−110
+124%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 96
+54.8%
60−65
−54.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+55.6%
45−50
−55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+55.6%
35−40
−55.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+56%
24−27
−56%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+50%
27−30
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+52.9%
130−140
−52.9%
Hitman 3 54
+92.9%
27−30
−92.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+81.6%
45−50
−81.6%
Metro Exodus 76
+68.9%
45−50
−68.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+70.6%
50−55
−70.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+79.3%
27−30
−79.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 236
+73.5%
130−140
−73.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+85%
40−45
−85%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40
+73.9%
21−24
−73.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+106%
18−20
−106%
Hitman 3 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
−18.3%
120−130
+18.3%
Metro Exodus 52
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+96.2%
24−27
−96.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+100%
14−16
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 28
+115%
12−14
−115%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry 5 25
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+78.8%
30−35
−78.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+69%
27−30
−69%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
+54.5%
10−12
−54.5%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+81%
21−24
−81%

This is how RTX 2060 and Arc A550M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 59% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 54% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 is 57% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 is 152% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A550M is 124% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
  • Arc A550M is ahead in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.70 24.50
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 2060 has a 49.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A550M, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A550M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop card while Arc A550M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
Intel Arc A550M
Arc A550M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10343 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Arc A550M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.