Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2060 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
30.42
+332%

RTX 2060 Mobile outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a whopping 332% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking184554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency18.1224.11
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU106no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920768
Core clock speed960 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate144.0no data
Floating-point processing power4.608 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs120no data
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Mobile 30.42
+332%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 7.04

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 Mobile 21262
+427%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 4033

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2060 Mobile 16331
+339%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 3717

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2060 Mobile 99179
+255%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 27960

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2060 Mobile 6141
+603%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 873

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
+395%
21
−395%
1440p67
+379%
14−16
−379%
4K38
+375%
8−9
−375%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 91
+333%
21−24
−333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71
+344%
16−18
−344%
Battlefield 5 119
+341%
27−30
−341%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88
+389%
18−20
−389%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Far Cry 5 105
+338%
24−27
−338%
Far Cry New Dawn 110
+358%
24−27
−358%
Forza Horizon 4 366
+358%
80−85
−358%
Hitman 3 83
+361%
18−20
−361%
Horizon Zero Dawn 223
+346%
50−55
−346%
Metro Exodus 130
+333%
30−33
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100
+376%
21−24
−376%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 148
+393%
30−33
−393%
Watch Dogs: Legion 227
+354%
50−55
−354%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 107
+346%
24−27
−346%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+367%
12−14
−367%
Battlefield 5 105
+338%
24−27
−338%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+339%
18−20
−339%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Far Cry 5 85
+372%
18−20
−372%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+356%
18−20
−356%
Forza Horizon 4 280
+367%
60−65
−367%
Hitman 3 75
+369%
16−18
−369%
Horizon Zero Dawn 196
+336%
45−50
−336%
Metro Exodus 112
+367%
24−27
−367%
Red Dead Redemption 2 75
+369%
16−18
−369%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123
+356%
27−30
−356%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190
+375%
40−45
−375%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50
+400%
10−11
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+380%
10−11
−380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
+383%
12−14
−383%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+390%
10−11
−390%
Far Cry 5 62
+343%
14−16
−343%
Forza Horizon 4 88
+389%
18−20
−389%
Hitman 3 66
+371%
14−16
−371%
Horizon Zero Dawn 94
+348%
21−24
−348%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107
+346%
24−27
−346%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+400%
12−14
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
+375%
8−9
−375%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 79
+339%
18−20
−339%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65
+364%
14−16
−364%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+350%
12−14
−350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+344%
9−10
−344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+375%
8−9
−375%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42
+367%
9−10
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Far Cry 5 42
+367%
9−10
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 246
+347%
55−60
−347%
Hitman 3 46
+360%
10−11
−360%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70
+338%
16−18
−338%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+367%
12−14
−367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
+379%
14−16
−379%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210
+367%
45−50
−367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 62
+343%
14−16
−343%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 32
+357%
7−8
−357%
Far Cry New Dawn 30
+400%
6−7
−400%
Hitman 3 28
+367%
6−7
−367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 86
+378%
18−20
−378%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+333%
9−10
−333%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
+400%
5−6
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 22
+340%
5−6
−340%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20
+400%
4−5
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+344%
9−10
−344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 15
+400%
3−4
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+400%
6−7
−400%

This is how RTX 2060 Mobile and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 395% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 379% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Mobile is 375% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.42 7.04
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 20 Watt

RTX 2060 Mobile has a 332.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 200% more advanced lithography process, and 475% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1677 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.