Radeon E8950 vs GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated370
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameTU106BAmethyst
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)29 September 2015 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19202048
Core clock speedno data735 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate187.2128.0
Floating-point processing power5.99 gflops4.096 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed11 GB/s6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.21.2.131
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 January 2019 29 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 3 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

Radeon E8950, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh and Radeon E8950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh is a notebook card while Radeon E8950 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh
AMD Radeon E8950
Radeon E8950

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 99 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon E8950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.