Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated14
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.76
Power efficiencyno data17.17
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 January 2020 (4 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19205376
Core clock speed1365 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2394 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate201.6804.4
Floating-point processing power6.451 TFLOPS51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs48192
TMUs120336
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores3084

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm276 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB20 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2020 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 2060 TU104 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 and Radeon RX 7900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 62 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1794 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.