UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Super with UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060 Super
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
42.87
+808%

RTX 2060 Super outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 808% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking90646
Place by popularity17not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.01no data
Power efficiency16.79no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameTU106Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 July 2019 (5 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores217632
Core clock speed1470 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Wattno data
Texture fill rate224.4no data
Floating-point processing power7.181 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs136no data
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores34no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Super 42.87
+808%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.72

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 Super 29668
+836%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 3168

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 2060 Super 83631
+513%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2060 Super 22243
+792%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 2495

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2060 Super 121804
+675%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 15716

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2060 Super 495174
+338%
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 112966

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD117
+550%
18
−550%
1440p67
+168%
25
−168%
4K42
+250%
12
−250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.41no data
1440p5.96no data
4K9.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 88
+780%
10
−780%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 101
+677%
12−14
−677%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
+636%
11
−636%
Battlefield 5 163
+1258%
12−14
−1258%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 102
+920%
10−11
−920%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+888%
8−9
−888%
Far Cry 5 130
+1200%
10−11
−1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 144
+1008%
12−14
−1008%
Forza Horizon 4 299
+931%
27−30
−931%
Hitman 3 94
+840%
10
−840%
Horizon Zero Dawn 298
+861%
30−35
−861%
Metro Exodus 144
+555%
22
−555%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+713%
15
−713%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 205
+1106%
16−18
−1106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 229
+387%
47
−387%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 147
+1031%
12−14
−1031%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
+656%
9
−656%
Battlefield 5 150
+1150%
12−14
−1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
+850%
10−11
−850%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+788%
8−9
−788%
Far Cry 5 108
+980%
10−11
−980%
Far Cry New Dawn 106
+715%
12−14
−715%
Forza Horizon 4 271
+834%
27−30
−834%
Hitman 3 98
+989%
9
−989%
Horizon Zero Dawn 293
+845%
30−35
−845%
Metro Exodus 144
+800%
16
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95
+692%
12−14
−692%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 184
+982%
17
−982%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+418%
16−18
−418%
Watch Dogs: Legion 216
+402%
43
−402%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
+369%
12−14
−369%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 61
+1120%
5−6
−1120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
+610%
10−11
−610%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+675%
8−9
−675%
Far Cry 5 74
+640%
10−11
−640%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+314%
27−30
−314%
Hitman 3 84
+740%
10−11
−740%
Horizon Zero Dawn 131
+1210%
10
−1210%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156
+875%
16
−875%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+963%
8
−963%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114
+850%
12−14
−850%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 96
+967%
9−10
−967%
Far Cry New Dawn 74
+957%
7−8
−957%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
+1200%
4−5
−1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+840%
5−6
−840%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
+1225%
4−5
−1225%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Far Cry 5 57
+1040%
5−6
−1040%
Forza Horizon 4 259
+2778%
9−10
−2778%
Hitman 3 58
+544%
9−10
−544%
Horizon Zero Dawn 99
+800%
10−12
−800%
Metro Exodus 87
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
+850%
12−14
−850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 212
+607%
30−33
−607%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 82
+811%
9−10
−811%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+1467%
3−4
−1467%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+1267%
3−4
−1267%
Hitman 3 39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
+2000%
5−6
−2000%
Metro Exodus 64
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+5800%
1−2
−5800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+1067%
3−4
−1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 29
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 19 0−1
Far Cry 5 30
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+1575%
4−5
−1575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65
+829%
7−8
−829%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+740%
5−6
−740%

This is how RTX 2060 Super and UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Super is 550% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 168% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 Super is 6300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2060 Super surpassed UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 42.87 4.72
Recency 9 July 2019 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm

RTX 2060 Super has a 808.3% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Super is a desktop card while UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 12607 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.