Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	215	54
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	86.70
Power efficiency	26.87	14.11
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU106	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	29 January 2020 (4 years ago)	17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$334

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	2560
Core clock speed	975 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	1185 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	142.2	413.0
Floating-point processing power	4.55 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	64
TMUs	120	160
Tensor Cores	240	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	30	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 25.37

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 51.26
+102%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 Max-Q 9752

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 19705
+102%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	94 −91.5%	180−190 +91.5%
1440p	34 −91.2%	65−70 +91.2%
4K	41 −95.1%	80−85 +95.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.86
1440p	no data	5.14
4K	no data	4.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −92.3%	100−105 +92.3%
Elden Ring	80−85 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −94.8%	150−160 +94.8%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −92.3%	100−105 +92.3%
Forza Horizon 4	130 −100%	260−270 +100%
Metro Exodus	75 −100%	150−160 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	93 −93.5%	180−190 +93.5%
Valorant	109 −102%	220−230 +102%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −94.8%	150−160 +94.8%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −92.3%	100−105 +92.3%
Dota 2	102 −96.1%	200−210 +96.1%
Elden Ring	80−85 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%
Far Cry 5	77 −94.8%	150−160 +94.8%
Fortnite	120−130 −96.9%	250−260 +96.9%
Forza Horizon 4	106 −98.1%	210−220 +98.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	94 −91.5%	180−190 +91.5%
Metro Exodus	57 −93%	110−120 +93%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	235 −91.5%	450−500 +91.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −100%	110−120 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −92.8%	160−170 +92.8%
Valorant	76 −97.4%	150−160 +97.4%
World of Tanks	250−260 −93.1%	500−550 +93.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 −94.8%	150−160 +94.8%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −92.3%	100−105 +92.3%
Dota 2	115 −100%	230−240 +100%
Far Cry 5	75−80 −94.8%	150−160 +94.8%
Forza Horizon 4	93 −93.5%	180−190 +93.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −88.7%	300−310 +88.7%
Valorant	93 −93.5%	180−190 +93.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	40−45 −97.7%	85−90 +97.7%
Elden Ring	45−50 −100%	90−95 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −97.7%	85−90 +97.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −100%	350−400 +100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
World of Tanks	160−170 −79.6%	300−310 +79.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −96.1%	100−105 +96.1%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −89.2%	140−150 +89.2%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −91.2%	130−140 +91.2%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −89.7%	110−120 +89.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −89.2%	70−75 +89.2%
Valorant	65−70 −88.4%	130−140 +88.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Dota 2	40−45 −93.2%	85−90 +93.2%
Elden Ring	20−22 −100%	40−45 +100%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −93.2%	85−90 +93.2%
Metro Exodus	20−22 −100%	40−45 +100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −92.3%	150−160 +92.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −93.2%	85−90 +93.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Dota 2	79 −89.9%	150−160 +89.9%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −91.2%	65−70 +91.2%
Fortnite	30−35 −87.5%	60−65 +87.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%
Valorant	30−35 −97%	65−70 +97%

This is how RTX 2060 Max-Q and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB compete in popular games:

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 91% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 91% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 95% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	25.37	51.26
Recency	29 January 2020	17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	250 Watt

RTX 2060 Max-Q has 284.6% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 102% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.