RTX A400 vs GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated420
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data15.47
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA107GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048768
Core clock speed832 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz1762 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate73.9242.29
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs6424
Tensor Cores6424
Ray Tracing Cores326

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 December 2021 16 April 2024
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2050 Max-Q has 66.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q and RTX A400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q is a notebook card while RTX A400 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 156 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 15 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.